Although President George W. Bush is part of an Oval Office father-son dynasty, he doesn't draw much ideological inspiration from his namesake. The best way to contextualize his presidency is to compare it to the eight-year tenure of Ronald Reagan. Both men both came to office advocating smaller government, a strong defense and a devotion to judicial and social conservatism. But their paths sometimes diverged.
In office, both presided over tax cuts, a military buildup and a rightward tilt of the federal judiciary. But while Reagan avoided major growth of domestic programs, Bush presided over a record expansion of Medicare and of federal oversight on education. On foreign policy, Reagan signed arms control treaties with former enemies; Bush has been adamant about not wanting to meet with the heads of enemy nations—three of whom he famously said constitute an axis of evil.
Who better to sort out this subject than the father-and-son team of Lou and Carl Cannon? Lou Cannon covered Reagan for The Washington Post and other papers and has written five books about him. Carl Cannon covered the current president for the National Journal and has written a biography of Bush's political guru Karl Rove. Their first joint literary effort, Reagan's Disciple draws on both their Rolodexes and on some of the best historical scholarship out there.
The Cannons conclude that while Bush indeed owes much to Reagan, including a strong conservative worldview, he lacks some of Reagan's political and communication skills. They predict that history will be kinder to the Gipper.
"Bush was Reagan's disciple, to be sure, but he did not face the seminal crises of his administration—especially the Iraq war—with the blend of principle and pragmatism that was the hallmark of Reagan's dealings with the Soviet Union. We do not fault Bush's intentions, but noble intentions do not excuse his performance in Iraq or the domestic failures of his second term,'' they write.
The Cannons corroborate their conclusions by analyzing scholarly literature on presidential war-making. They debunk the argument offered by some Bush supporters that the Iraq war was an example of Bush borrowing from the Woodrow Wilson playbook. They quote renowned Stanford University historian David Kennedy's characterization of Bush's desire to spread democracy in the Middle East as "Wilsonism on steroids," but point out that Wilson favored having the United States help create conditions in which democracy could flourish—not necessarily create democracies itself.
Claude R. Marx is the author of a chapter on media and politics in The Sixth-Year Itch, edited by Larry Sabato.
Quick Picks
In the Ring: The Trials of a Washington Lawyer
Robert S. Bennett
400 pages, Random House, $27.50
In his new memoir, Robert S. Bennett says that law is the magic carpet that has led him to the powerful people he's worked with. He claims his attitude as a "street fighter" made him take on clients ranging from bookies to former President Bill Clinton. Bennett shares behind-the-scenes color about his high-profile cases, from Iran-Contra to Plamegate to the Keating Five scandal. The chapter on Abraham Zapruder's film of the Kennedy assassination, for example, details how Zapruder's last-minute decision to view the presidential motorcade affected his family.
—Corinne Minard
Safire's Political Dictionary
William Safire
880 pages, Oxford University Press, $22.95
William Safire's Language and Politics has long been used as a source of definitions for insider words and phrases commonly used in politics. Updated and expanded for the first time since 1993, Safire renames the book and adds items like "war on terror," "chad" and "axis of evil" to the collection. Containing not only words' definitions, but also their history, Safire explains each entry in an informative, witty and easy-to-read way.
—Corinne Minard
The Teapot Dome Scandal: How Big Oil Bought the Harding White House and Tried to Steal the Country
Laton McCartney
Random House, 351 pages, $27
To be sure, Pelosi's political philosophy is closely aligned with her liberal San Francisco district. Yet the first female speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives is also an incredibly shrewd tactician and dealmaker who wants to win at almost all costs.
Former San Francisco Chronicle Washington bureau chief Marc Sandalow nicely captures the collection of contradictions that is Pelosi in his new biography. Although Pelosi declined to talk to him for the book, Sandalow draws on his earlier interviews with her to help create a balanced account.
Sandalow allows the facts to speak for themselves and doesn't show much of his voice during the often bland narrative. He seems to respect Pelosi's political skills, but the frequent descriptions of her as "brusque" leads one to conclude that he doesn't much like her.
Pelosi's strengths include a Midas touch with fundraising and an extraordinary ability to persuade. Those skills—learned at the knee of her father, former Baltimore mayor and congressman Thomas D'Alesandro—helped her rise to the House's top spot. "She understood the mannerisms and the tempo of the House. She had a way with older members. She could chop her opponents off at the knee in a policy dispute. In a social setting, she would never come across as menacing," Sandalow writes.
He notes that while Pelosi is a solid liberal, she has declined to push the agenda of those who favor an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or impeaching President Bush. That direction, she calculates, would risk her party's long-term health.
While Pelosi has had some legislative successes—like increasing funding for AIDS research and putting pressure on China to improve its human rights policy—she does not come across as a policy heavyweight. Sandalow notes that she rarely strays from her talking points during policy discussions.
Of course, leaders need not be policy wonks. Sandalow contends that Pelosi is an expert at doing what leaders are elected to do: counting votes and enforcing party discipline. He points out that when Democrats were in the minority, she was often able to keep moderates in the fold on key votes so that Republicans had little margin for error.
We will have to wait until Pelosi's tenure in the House's top job ends for a final assessment, but Madam Speaker will be an important starting point for future books on the subject.
Claude R. Marx is author of a chapter on media and politics in The Sixth-Year Itch, edited by Larry J. Sabato.
By Robert Schlesinger
Simon & Schuster, 592 pages, $30
Robert Schlesinger (son of presidential speechwriter Arthur Schlesinger Jr. and a Politics contributor) gained access to about 90 current and former White House speechwriters. The result is a richly detailed trove of anecdotes about the most memorable speeches. Michael Gerson, for example, watched the plane fly into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, then started writing speech ideas in the notebook he kept in his car. Schlesinger also dives into the profession's inherent tensions: Should speechwriters help make policy or merely promote it? Whose rhetorical preferences should hold more sway, top advisors or writers? The results offer a totally absorbing view of the modern presidency.
—Corinne Minard
Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout
By Donald P. Green and Alan S. Gerber
Brookings Institution Press, 225 pages, $16.95
Think that perfect storm of direct mail, robocalls and door-to-door canvassing—all timed to increase voter turnout—is effective? Think again, say two Yale political science professors in the second edition of their influential book. Their findings are sure to irk some industry insiders. With new data, Green and Gerber again cast doubt on the effectiveness of direct mail and robocalls for GOTV.
—Shane D'Aprile
Eleanor vs. Ike: A Novel
By Robin Gerber
Avon (HarperCollins), 315 pages, $13.95
Dual biographies are a tricky subgenre of nonfiction to pull off. Striking the right balance between offering straight biographical information and shedding light on the dynamics of the subjects’ relationship requires both prodigious research and a great flare for storytelling. The challenge is especially tough when you’re trying to tackle two such paradoxical, larger-than-life people as former President Bill Clinton and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Fortunately, University of Oklahoma history professor Steven M. Gillon pulls it off. He has done a solid job of navigating their lives and careers. Much of his new book synthesizes the existing material on the subject, with a few new quotes tossed in for good measure. Those who have read Clinton’s memoir (My Life), John Harris’ biography of him (The Survivor) or one of several books by and about Gingrich will find much familiar material. What makes Gillon’s book worth reading is his analysis of the nuances of their relationship and his ability to look at his subjects in the context of the 1960s, when they came of age politically.
Gillon, the resident historian for the History Channel, argues that the men respected and liked, but often distrusted, one another. They were able to work together because both were willing to go against the wishes of their respective party’s most ideologically fervent members. But Clinton bested Gingrich much of the time, Gillon writes, because “Clinton possessed a much higher emotional intelligence. The president peeled Gingrich like an onion. … Gingrich lacked Clinton’s human touch. He could read a roomful of people but became tone deaf when it came to one-on-one encounters.”
The book’s most interesting revelation is the extent to which Clinton and Gingrich had planned to work together on a compromise that would have put Social Security and Medicare on firmer financial footing. Their meetings took place without the knowledge of members of their parties, whom they were afraid would object to giving the other side a big win on such an important issue. But then two words changed all that: Monica Lewinsky. The revelation made most policy progress all but impossible.
Readers will learn a lot about policy, politics and psychology, but will have to wade through Gillon’s often pedestrian writing style to do so. At times, The Pact reads like a doctoral dissertation that was turned into a book. Yet that’s a small shortcoming in an otherwise insightful and enjoyable examination of two of the most important political leaders of the late 20th century.
Claude R. Marx is author of a chapter on media and politics in The Sixth Year Itch, edited by Larry J. Sabato.
Quick Picks
Alpha Dogs: The Americans Who Turned Political Spin into a Global Business
By James Harding
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, $25, 272 pp.
Alpha Dogs is about the formation, high points and ultimate demise of Sawyer Miller, a public relations consulting firm that was one of the first professional political consulting firms in the 1970s and 1980s. Sawyer Miller helped create the modern negative ad, and saw “spin” as an essential part of the firm’s work. Harding describes Sawyer Miller’s national and international campaigns, from the speeches it crafted to how its principals badgered candidates into taking advice. Harding tells the stories of clients like President Cory Aquino of the Philippines, and what the firm had to do to not only win over the Filipino people,
but President Ronald Reagan as well.
—Corinne Minard
Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns
By Erika Falk
University of Illinois Press, $19.95, 192 pp.
Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama announced their presidential candidacies the same month. According to Erika Falk, Obama received far more news coverage, although he trailed Clinton in the polls. Falk looks at eight women who ran for president through 2004, comparing their media treatment with their male opponents. She concludes that the press often portrayed women as unviable candidates, while ignoring their ideas and intent. Falk argues that this different treatment challenges the assumption that men and women have equal access to power.
—Lauren Zingarelli
The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns
By D. Sunshine Hillygus and Todd G. Shields
Princeton University Press, $29.95, 268 pp.
Are swing voters really swayed by wedge issues? In this political game-theory exercise, Hillygus and Shields argue that “cross-pressured partisans” are a more complicated voting bloc than previously thought. With a look at microtargeting data and historical examples of campaign strategy, the authors conclude that candidates use controversial issues like abortion and immigration more often when they know what swing voters are thinking about.
—Ryan Reeh
The Birth of Modern Politics: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams and the Election of 1828
Reforming the Presidential Nomination Process